1834 Randall Ct - flood explorer

v7, fully self-contained - neighbourhood and lot, one slider. The 1 m lidar is embedded in this file, not just its conclusions: 1,681 ground elevations on a 41x41 grid at 2 m over an 80 x 80 m box centred on the house. Source USGS 3DEP, tile USGS one metre x57y442 IN Central MarionCo 2016, flown 11-18 Mar 2016, NAVD88 feet. Water from USGS 03351005 White River at Ravenswood, datum 709.98 ft, 0.36 mi away, which crested at 726.86 ft, 5:15 pm Sat 15 Aug 2026. No network calls, no external references.

Ravenswood, 1.6 x 1.6 km, USGS 3DEP resampled to 20 m. Same water level as the lot view below, and water is limited to ground actually connected to the river. Red marker is the house.
Water level on the lot
Contours every 0.5 ft. Values under the roofline are interpolated by the lidar vendor, not measured - they represent ground at the foundation. Fill is a level surface, which is why the whole lot wets at once; it does not solve flow.

At this level

Lag behind the river
river crested 726.9 ft
Vs your floor
floor 725.5 ft
FeatureElevWater
Floor = grade + one 7.5 in step, per your description. Grade re-measured at 724.97 ft; earlier runs gave 724.88. Treat +/-0.1 ft as the noise floor.

When it comes back off

Clears belowElevFastestSlowest
Your finished floor725.5Sun 06:30Mon 00:30
Grade at the house724.9Sun 10:15Mon 06:45
Garage apron724.7Sun 12:15Mon 09:45
Lowest adjacent grade723.9Sun 15:50Mon 15:40
Cul-de-sac pavement723.9Sun 16:35Mon 17:10
Randall Ct sag, 40 m S723.1Sun 19:50Mon 23:35
Lowest point on the lot722.9Sun 20:40Tue 01:20
Fastest follows the NWS Nora forecast, slowest the NWS Ravenswood forecast point, both mapped onto USGS 03351005 by the offset measured at the crest. Observed: peak 16.88 ft 17:15 Sat, 16.52 ft by 22:45, falling ~0.1 ft/hr and accelerating - between the two cases.

Elevation key (ft NAVD88)

Gauges, records and how this flood ranks

GaugeDistanceGivesRecord
USGS 03351005 White River at Ravenswood0.36 miStage only. Datum 709.98 ft NAVD88 (+/-0.11). All elevations here.30 Jun 2012 ->
USGS 03351000 White River near Nora, 82nd St2.9 river mi upStage and discharge. Datum 710.51 ft. All cfs, and anything pre-2012.1913 ->
NWS RVNI3 / NORI3-Forecast points. Recession shape only, never elevations.-

Ravenswood gauge, every annual peak in its record, paired with discharge at Nora in the same event.

YearDateStageWater surfaceNora flow
202615 Aug16.88726.8634,500
201319 Apr14.01723.9925,200
20175 May12.59722.5721,400
20257 Apr11.89721.8719,100
201528 Jun11.88721.8618,700
20185 Apr11.62721.6018,600
202413 Apr11.56721.5418,000
202012 Jan10.66720.6417,100
201927 Apr10.62720.6016,100
202218 Feb10.44720.4215,100
20235 Mar8.41718.3911,000
2016 / 2021 / 2014 / 2012-7.11-11.16714.5-721.11,600-14,400

Those eleven pairs give ~0.31 ft of water surface at Ravenswood per 1,000 cfs at Nora in the upper range.

RankDateNora flowNora stageRavenswood
126 Mar 191358,50022.40no gauge
215 Aug 202634,500~21.1726.86 measured
319 May 194332,40018.19no gauge
4=23 Apr 196430,40018.65no gauge
4=30 Jun 195730,40018.04no gauge
61 Jan 199128,70019.19~725.1 estimated

What constrains the peak on your lot: at least 723.9 ft, because you saw the waterline at the cul-de-sac end of the driveway at 3 pm; at most 726.9 ft, because the lot cannot exceed the river. Your floor at 725.5 sits near the middle of that band. The 3 ft lag measured at 3 pm and the short crest argue the lower half; efficient street conveyance argues the upper half. Nothing available resolves it.

The 1991 figure is extrapolated from the eleven pairs above, not a reading - no gauge existed at Ravenswood then. It cross-checks: 1991 stood 1.91 ft lower at Nora, and the extrapolation puts it 1.79 ft lower here. This flood carried 20% more water than 1991 and ran ~1.8 ft higher at your address. In 98 years only 1913 was bigger.

Not an official flood-inundation map and not a hydraulic model. FEMA NFHL regulatory 1% surface is 727.9 ft at cross-section 18097C_345, 82 m away. Generated 16 Aug 2026.